The 1995 Blog

1995: The year the future began

The ’90s deserve better

The 1990s deserve better.

Deserve better than the erratic, schlocky, and often-trivial episode that the National Geographic Channel served up last night, in the first of three installments of a docu-series titled “The ’90s: The Last Great Decade?

The inaugural two-hour program was more pop culture retrospective than a serious and useful reassessment of a recent, important yet much-misunderstood time. It did little to address, let alone answer, the question in the series subtitle, “Last Great Decade?”

It’s a foolish question, anyway, and essentially unanswerable.

A more pertinent and revealing question would be: Were the ’90s truly a “holiday from history”?cropped-1995fullcover_1.jpg

As I point out in my forthcoming book, 1995: The Year the Future Began, “Crude myth has begun to define the American 1990s. In recent years, the conservative syndicated columnist Charles Krauthammer has taken to scoffing at the 1990s as a ‘holiday from history,’ a ‘soporific Golden Age,’ an unserious time when the United States largely ignored the gathering threat of Islamic terrorism only to pay a staggering price in 2001. The decade was, Krauthammer has said, ‘our retreat from seriousness, our Seinfeld decade of obsessive ordinariness.’”

Krauthammer’s critique is aimed principally at Bill Clinton, whom Krauthammer has dismissed as “a president perfectly suited to the time — a time of domesticity, triviality and self-absorption.”

It’s quite an indictment – overstated for sure but grist for serious television programming.

The ’90s were more complex that a “soporific Golden Age.” The decade was no holiday from history. But you certainly wouldn’t get that impression in watching the superficial fare that National Geographic Channel presented.


‘Right man for the times’? 

Tellingly, last night’s episode offered dubious assertion without analysis. At one point in his voiceover, narrator Rob Lowe declared that “Bill Clinton was the right man for the times,” but failed to explain how or why the former governor of Arkansas merited such distinction. Indeed, the segments about Clinton’s successful run for the presidency in 1992 tended to emphasize his womanizing and his slick and slippery side.

Rather than “the right man for the times,” Clinton was an infinitely lucky politician. He was unfailingly fortunate in having woeful political foes.

The contenders for the Democratic presidential nomination in 1992 were decidedly second-tier figures such as Jerry Brown and Paul Tsongas, neither of whom possessed the political instincts or wiliness of Bill Clinton. His Republican opponent in the 1992 general election, President George H.W. Bush, was bumbling and widely seen as out of touch, unable to come to grips with a sharp economic downturn.

Last night’s installment included a clip of the annoying and uncharming Roseanne Barr who claimed to have been “definitely responsible” for Clinton’s election in 1992 because she said on her comedy sitcom that it was time for a change at the top.

And so it went. The first episode at times was head-shakingly bad.

It referred to Playboy Playmate Anna Nicole Smith as “iconic.” It said Roseanne was “revolutionary.” It devoted as much time (or perhaps more) to the Grunge musician Kurt Cobain, who killed himself in 1994, as it did to the epic Netscape-Microsoft “browser war” of the mid- and late-1990s — and without a word from any of the principals of Netscape, a colorful and impressively innovative California startup.

The effect of all this was to reinforce the notion that the ’90s were frivolous, a wayward time of superficial indulgence. The leadoff installment of the National Geographic miniseries certainly does not bode well for the remaining two ’90s programs, to be aired tonight and Tuesday.


More from The 1995 blog:

40 comments on “The ’90s deserve better

  1. Pingback: What did the ’90s mean? |

  2. Pingback: Anniversaries and controversies for |

  3. Pingback: Recalling the ‘coolness’ of the early Web |

  4. Pingback: How important was Netscape? |

  5. Pingback: Illuminating the Web: Netscape’s IPO of August 1995 |

  6. Pingback: Lesson misunderstood: NATO’s 1995 bombing in Bosnia |

  7. Pingback: Hype and hoopla in a watershed year: Launching Windows 95 |

  8. Pingback: So. Africa case like the O.J. Simpson trial in 1995? Only marginally |

  9. Pingback: Recalling the ’95 case against lecherous Bob Packwood, whom Biden praised yesterday |

  10. Pingback: The inevitablity of O.J. Simpson’s acquittal in 1995 |

  11. Pingback: The big gap in Monica Lewinsky’s speech |

  12. Pingback: It’s out: ’1995: The Year the Future Began’ |

  13. Pingback: Looking back to 1995, the year the future began | The 1995 Blog

  14. Pingback: Quirkiness on New Year’s, 1995: ‘Far Side’ farewell, errant Clinton prediction | The 1995 Blog

  15. Pingback: Rolling out 1995 | The 1995 Blog

  16. Pingback: Media fail: A 1995 subtext that’s familiar today | The 1995 Blog

  17. Pingback: Watershed status of 1995 explored in book rollout at Newseum | The 1995 Blog

  18. Pingback: Going ‘Majic’ for a brisk radio discussion about 1995 | The 1995 Blog

  19. Pingback: ‘1995 was watershed moment in consumer technology,’ says Intel CEO | The 1995 Blog

  20. Pingback: What ‘Time’ forgot in its look back to 1995 | The 1995 Blog

  21. Pingback: Much tedium, little drama in CNN rehash of O.J. Simpson trial | The 1995 Blog

  22. Pingback: Monica Lewinsky’s essay was solid: But award-winning? Probably not | The 1995 Blog

  23. Pingback: O.J. and DNA: Applying the ‘Page 99 Test’ to ‘1995’ | The 1995 Blog

  24. Pingback: Recalling the quaint early struggles to describe the Web | The 1995 Blog

  25. Pingback: 20 years on: Recalling O.J.’s wretched bestseller | The 1995 Blog

  26. Pingback: Part One: Highlights of ‘1995’ interview with | The 1995 Blog

  27. Pingback: Part Two: Interview takes up scandal and the ’90s ‘zeitgeist’ | The 1995 Blog

  28. Pingback: Dow opening today at record high: Reminiscent of 1995 | The 1995 Blog

  29. Pingback: ‘The Internet? Bah!’ Classic off-target essay appeared 20 years ago | The 1995 Blog

  30. Pingback: Clinton, his portrait, and the persistent shadow of scandal | The 1995 Blog

  31. Pingback: ‘The Internet Tidal Wave,’ 20 years on | The 1995 Blog

  32. Pingback: Nat Geo’s cartoonish treatment of Hearst v. Pulitzer | Media Myth Alert

  33. Pingback: Hinge moment at the O.J. ‘Trial of the Century’ | The 1995 Blog

  34. Pingback: The ‘cyberporn’ scare of 1995: Demonstrating the early Web’s corrective power | The 1995 Blog

  35. Pingback: 20 years on: Remembering the senator who quit in disgrace | The 1995 Blog

  36. Pingback: Spoofing her majesty in the ‘Great Royal Phone Embarrassment’ of 1995 | The 1995 Blog

  37. Pingback: Messaging, sequencing a puzzle as CNN launches ’90s series | The 1995 Blog

  38. Pingback: For Bill Clinton, the reckoning grinds on | The 1995 Blog

  39. Pingback: 25 years on: Bill Gates’ ‘Internet Tidal Wave’ memo, a seminal document of the unfolding digital age | The 1995 Blog

  40. Pingback: ‘Too tight’: The botched glove demonstration at O.J. ‘Trial of the Century’ in 1995 | The 1995 Blog

Comments are closed.


This entry was posted on July 7, 2014 by in 1990s, Clinton-Lewinsky, Internet, Terrorism and tagged , , , .


Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

%d bloggers like this: